Studies on the effect of ultrasound on properties and bonding strength of dentin smear layer / 口腔医学

Objective@# To explore the effect of ultrasound on dentin smear layer's surface and bonding strength of the universal resin adhesive under self-etching mode. @*Methods@# Forty mandibular third molars without caries were randomly divided into two groups; one was polished with silicon carbide sandpaper; the other was polished with silicon carbide sandpaper followed by ultrasonic treatment. Scanning electron microscope (SEM) was used to observe surface of the dentin. Treated teeth were bonded with two universal resin adhesives, Clearfil Universal Bond (pH=2.3) and All-Bond Universal (pH=3.1), and the penetration of the bonding interface was observed with a confocal laser scanning microscope (CLSM) after Rhodamine B staining. Finally, the micro tensile bond strength test was conducted to test the adhesion. @*Results@# The SEM showed that after polishing with silicon carbide sandpaper, the smear layer of the dentin surface was scratched, and dentin tubules were almost completely blocked, with no obvious dentin tubules exposed. After ultrasonic treatment, the scratches were reduced, and a large number of dentin tubules were exposed. CLSM showed that both adhesives could penetrate the dentin along the dentin tubules more deeply after ultrasound treatment. Micro tensile bond strength tests showed that ultrasonic treatment could enhance the bonding strength of two universal resin adhesives. However, there was no statistical difference in bonding strength between these two universal resin adhesives under the same treatment. .@*Conclusion@# Ultrasound can partially remove the smear layer on dentin's surface, expose dentin tubules, and increase universal resin adhesives' penetration depth and bonding strength under self-etching mode

The effect of acid concentration and etch time on morphology and tensile bond strength of primary dentin An in vitro study

Background: There are conflicting results concerning the ideal time for etching primary dentin and its effect on the bond strength of adhesive restorative materials. Aim: To assess in vitro, the effect of varied acid concentration and etch time on the morphological features and tensile bond strength of primary dentin. Materials and Methods: Forty healthy primary molars were prepared by exposing the dentin of the occlusal surface, creating a smear layer. A 3 mm × 3 mm test indow was demarcated, and specimens were randomly allocated to four groups (n = 10): Group 1A 10% phosphoric acid, 7 s; Group 1B 10% phosphoric acid, 15 s; Group 2A 37% phosphoric acid, 7 s and Group 2B 37% phosphoric acid, 15 s. Surface analysis was done using atomic force microscope and scanning electron microscope. For tensile bond strength evaluation, 24 specimens prepared as mentioned were mounted in acrylic blocks and allocated to four groups according to the prescribed etching protocol. Resin rods were bonded and tested in tension after 24 h (n = 6). Data were analyzed statistically using unpaired t-test. Results: Etching of primary dentin using 37% phosphoric acid for 7 s produced the highest tensile bond strength of 9.51 ± 2.19 MPa. Conclusion: Etching time of 7 s may improve the adhesion of resin restorative materials with primary dentin.

Effect of different smear layers on the bonding performance and durability of four adhesive systems / 中国组织工程研究

BACKGROUND: When the tooth surface is treated with a rotary or manual instrument, a smudge layer is formed on the enamel and dentin by debris generated by cutting and abrasion. The bonding interface between the adhesive and the dentin is considered as a weak part in the direct repair process. To clarify the effect of smear layer on different kinds of adhesive is significantly important for dentists to select and correctly use the adhesive in clinical treatment. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of different diamond burs on the dentin bonding performance of four adhesive systems to dentin after 24 hours and 100 days of artificial saliva-storage. METHODS: Adhesive systems were: (1) VSA (Optibond Versa, Kerr); (2) AIO (Optibond All in One, Kerr); (3) SBU (Single bond Universal, 3M); (4) GLU (Bond 5, Gluma, Heraeus). In present study, 80 extracted human molars were randomly divided into four groups and each group is divided into 4 subgroups. Dentin surfaces were prepared by: (1) 600-grit SiC-paper (control group); (2) super-fine diamond bur; (3) regular diamond bur; (4) coarse diamond bur. Bonding agent was applied according to each manufacturer’s instruction. After light-curing, dentin surfaces were built-up with resin composite (A2, CHARISMA, Heraeus). The micro-tensile bond strength was determined after 24 hours and 100 days of storage in artificial saliva at 37 °C. The fractured surfaces on dentin side were observed by scanning electron microscope. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: (1) Storage for 24 hours: There was no significant difference among groups under VSA and GLU. Under SBU and AIO, the bond strength in the coarse diamond bur group was significantly lower than that in the control group (P 0. 05). Using coarse diamond bur, the bond strength in the VSA group had significant difference compared with the AIO, GLU and SBU groups (P 0. 05). (2) Storage for 100 days, there was no significant difference among groups under VSA and GLU. Under SBU, the bond strength in the coarse diamond bur group was significantly lower than that in the control group (P 0. 05). Using regular diamond bur, the bond strength showed no significant difference in the GLU group compared with the SBU, and VSA groups (P > 0. 05). Using coarse diamond bur, the bond strength had no significant difference between VSA and AIO groups (P < 0. 05). (3) Using VSA, the bond strength in each group at 100 days showed significant difference compared with that at 24 hours (P < 0. 05). (4)Compared with immersed for 24 hours, the ratio of bond interface and combined crack in the VSA, SBU and GLU groups after immersed for 100 days was increased, especially the VSA group. Compared with the other groups, the ratio of bond interface and combined crack in the GLU group after immersed for 24 hours and 100 days both increased by 50%. (5) These results indicate that preparation by different burs produces different smear layers, which has significant effect to self-etching adhesive system and has no significant effect to total-etching adhesive system. Storage time makes effect on different adhesives.

Effect of thermocycling on the micro-tensile bond strength between self-adhesive resin cement and nonphosphate monomer cements on zirconium-oxide ceramics

Objectives: The objective of the present study is to evaluate the bond strength of: (a) Zirconia blocks (tribochemical treatment and zirconia primer) and resin blocks bonded using self-adhesive resin cement (phosphate monomer cement). (b) Zirconia blocks and resin blocks bonded using nonphosphate monomer cement. (c) Micro-tensile bond strength of zirconia and resin blocks, bonded with self-adhesive resin cement and nonphosphate monomer cement after thermocycling. Materials and Methods: Twenty zirconium-dioxide specimens (5 mm × 5.4 mm × 13 mm) were produced using a metal mold. Each zirconium block was duplicated in light-curing resin material specimen (5 mm × 5.4 mm × 13 mm) using a mold made of addition silicon impression material. A total of 40 specimens were made, of which 20 specimens were zirconia blocks and 20 were resin blocks, which would be bonded to each other using phosphate monomer-containing cement (Multilink [10 nos.]) and nonphosphate monomer-containing cement (RELY-X [10 nos.]). The specimens were then divided into two groups of n = 10 each. The surface of zirconium specimen of one group (Group 1) was treated with zirconia primer and bonded with phosphate monomer-containing cement, and the other groups (Group 2) were not treated with any surface conditioning and were bonded with a nonphosphate containing cement. The specimens in each group were further subdivided into two subgroups of n = 5 each as follows: Group 1-1A (subjected to thermocycling), 1B (nonthermocycled) and Group 2-2A (subjected to thermocycling), 2B (nonthermocycled). Then, they were subjected for testing of tensile bond strength under a universal testing machine. Results: Resin cement selection seems to be a more relevant factor in the bonding of zirconia. The phosphate monomer-containing cement has the better bond strength after thermocycling compared to the nonphosphate monomer group. Thermocycling reduced the bond strength of both the groups and a significant difference was seen in the bond strength of nonphosphate monomer cement group subjected to thermocycling compared to the nonthermocycled one. Tensile bond strength values were significantly affected by the luting agent system employed and by thermal aging. Hence, for long-term durability, luting of zirconia with a phosphate monomer-containing cement after the zirconia has been surface treated is preferable as their bond strength did not show much significant difference after being subjected to thermocycling, compared to the nonthermocycled group. Conclusion: Resin cement selection seem to be a more relevent factor in the bonding of zirconia thermocycling does affect adhesion to to zirconium oxide ceramics.

Influence of 10-MDP concentration on the adhesion and physical properties of self-adhesive resin cements

OBJECTIVES: Self-adhesive resin cements contain functional monomers that enable them to adhere to the tooth structure without a separate adhesive or etchant. One of the most stable functional monomers used for chemical bonding to calcium in hydroxyapatite is 10-methacryloyloxydecyl dihydrogen phosphate (10-MDP). The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of the10-MDP concentration on the bond strength and physical properties of self-adhesive resin cements. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We used experimental resin cements containing 3 different concentrations of 10-MDP: 3.3 wt% (RC1), 6.6 wt% (RC2), or 9.9 wt% (RC3). The micro-tensile bond strength of each resin cement to dentin and a hybrid resin block (Estenia C&B, Kuraray Noritake Dental) was measured, and the fractured surface morphology was analyzed. Further, the flexural strength of the resin cements was measured using the three-point bending test. The water sorption and solubility of the cements following 30 days of immersion in water were measured. RESULTS: The bond strength of RC2 was significantly higher than that of RC1. There was no significant difference between the bond strength of RC2 and that of RC3. The water sorption of RC3 was higher than that of any other cement. There were no significant differences in the three-point bending strength or water solubility among all three types of cements. CONCLUSIONS: Within the limitations of this study, it is suggested that 6.6 wt% 10-MDP showed superior properties than 3.3 wt% or 9.9 wt% 10-MDP in self-adhesive resin cement.

Effect of liners and primers on tensile bond strength between zirconia and resin-based luting agent

PURPOSE: The effect of silica-based glass-ceramic liners on the tensile bond strength between zirconia and resin-based luting agent was evaluated and compared with the effect of 10-methacryloyloxydecyl dihydrogen phosphate (MDP)-containing primers. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Titanium abutments and zirconia crowns (n = 60) were fabricated, and the adhesive surfaces of the specimens were treated by airborne-particle abrasion. The specimens were divided into 5 groups based on surface treatment: a control group, 2 primer groups (MP: Monobond Plus; ZP: Z Prime Plus), and 2 liner groups (PL: P-containing Liner; PFL: P-free Liner). All specimens were cemented with self-adhesive resin-based luting agent. After 24-hour water storage and thermocycling (5,000 cycles, 5℃/55℃), the tensile bond strength was measured using a universal testing machine. Failure mode analysis and elemental analysis on the bonding interface were performed. The data were analyzed using Kruskal-Wallis test, Dunn's post hoc test, and Fisher's exact test. RESULTS: The liner groups and primer groups showed significantly higher tensile bond strengths than that of the control group (P < .05). PFL showed a significantly higher tensile bond strength than the primer groups (P < .05). The percentage of mixed failure was higher in the primer groups than in the control group (P < .001), and all the specimens showed mixed failure in the liner groups (P < .001). A chemical reaction area was observed at the bonding interface between zirconia and liner. CONCLUSION: The application of liner significantly increased the tensile bond strength between zirconia and resin-based luting agent. PFL was more effective than MDP-containing primers in improving the tensile bond strength with the resin-based luting agent.

Influência da clorexidina na resistência de união longitudinal à dentina: estudo in vitro / Influence of chlorhexidine on longitudinal bond strength to dentin: in vitro study

Objetivo: Este estudo avaliou o efeito da solução de gluconato de clorexidina 0,2% (CHX) usado como primer terapêutico sobre a resistência de união longitudinal de adesivo convencional a dentina. Material e Métodos: dentes bovinos foram desgastados para obter uma área de dentina, e foram divididos em 2 grupos: Grupo C (Controle) - ácido fosfórico à 37%) + 0,2% CHX por 30s + Single Bond. Blocos de resina composta form fabricados e armazenados por 24 h e 6 meses, seccionados e submetidos ao teste de resistência a microtração. Os resultados foram analisados por ANOVA dois-fatores seguido pelo teste de Tukey. Resultados: Valores de média (±Desvio-padrão) (MPa): Grupo CHX/24h - 41,8(±2,62)A; Grupo C/24h - 40,8(±3,35)AB; Grupo CHX/6 meses ­ 36,4(±3,52)B; Grupo CHX/6 meses - 26,1(±1,54) C. Resultados: Valores de média (±Desvio-padrão) (MPa): CHX (24 h) ­ 41,76 (±2,62)a; C (24h) ­ 40,81 (±3,35)ab; GT (24h): 37,38(2,98)abc; CHX (6 meses) ­ 36,04 (±3,52) bcd; EGCG (24h) ­ 35,91 (±4,82)cd; EGCG (6 meses) ­ 35,75 (±4,44)cd; GT (6 meses) ­ 31,95 (±3,40)de; C (6 meses): 30,05 (±1,54)e. Conclusão: CHX aumentou a resistência de união imediata da interface dentina-resina e significantemente reduziu a perda de resistência de união após 6 meses de armazenagem em água quando comparado ao grupo controle.(AU)

Objective: This study evaluated the effect of 0.2% chlorhexidine gluconate solution used as an therapeutic primer on the long-term bond strength of etch-and-rinse adhesive to dentin. Material and Methods: Bovine incisors were worn to expose an area of dentin and were divided into 2 groups: Group C (Control) - acid etching with 37% phosphoric acid + Single Bond; Group CHX (0.2% CHX) - acid etching with 37% phosphoric acid + 0.2% CHX for 30 s + Single Bond. Blocks of composite were fabricated and stored for 24 h or 6 months, sectioned into beams and submitted to microtensile tests. Results were analyzed by two-way ANOVA and Tukey tests. Results: Mean (±SD) values (in MPa) were as follow: Group CHX/24h - 41.8(±2.62)A; Group C/24h - 40.8(±3.35)AB; Group CHX/6 months ­ 36.4(±3.52)B; Group CHX/6 months - 26.1(±1.54)C. Conclusion: CHX improve the imediatte bond strength of resin-dentin and significantly lowered the loss of bond strength after 6 months water storage as seen in the control bonds.(AU)

Effect of chlorhexidine, green tea and egcg as therapeutic primers to increase the durability of resin-dentin bond / Efeito da clorexidina, do chá verde e do EGCG como primers terapêuticos para aumentar a durabilidade da adesão resinadentina

Objetivo: este estudo avaliou o efeito da solução de gluconato de clorexidina 0,2% (CHX), do chá verde e do componente ativo epigallocatequina 3-gallato (gel de EGCG) usados como primers terapêuticos sobre a resistência de união longitudinal de adesivo convencional a dentina. Material e Métodos: oitenta dentes bovinos foram desgastados para obter uma área de dentina plana, que foi condicionada (ácido fosfórico à 37%) seguida de lavagem. Os dentes foram divididos em 4 grupos (n- 20): Grupo C (Controle) - Single Bond; Grupo CHX – 0,2% CHX por 30s + Single Bond; Grupo EGCG - gel de EGCG 10µM por 30s + Single Bond; Group GT – chá verde aquoso por 30s + Single Bond. Blocos de resina composta form fabricados e armazenados por 24 h e 6 meses, seccionados e submetidos ao teste de resistência a microtração. Os resultados foram analisados por ANOVA dois-fatores seguido pelo teste de Tukey. Resultados: Valores de média (±Desvio-padrão) (MPa): CHX (24 h) – 41,76 (±2,62)a; C (24 h) – 40,81 (±3,35)ab; GT (24h): 37,38(2,98)abc; CHX (6 meses) – 36,04 (±3,52) bcd; EGCG (24h) – 35,91 (±4,82)cd; EGCG (6 meses) – 35,75 (±4,44)cd; GT (6 meses) – 31,95 (±3,40)de; C (6 meses): 30,05 (±1,54)e. Conclusão: O gel de EGCG produziu uma interface adesiva dentina-resina que não alterou os valores de resistência de união após 6 meses de armazenagem em água, mas reduziu a resistência de união para o tempo de 24 h quando comparado com os grupos Controle e CHX.

Objective: This study evaluated the effect of 0.2% chlorhexidine gluconate solution (CHX), green tea and active epigallocatechin-gallate (EGCG) used as therapeutic primers on the longterm bond strength of etch-and-rinse adhesive to dentin. Material and Methods: Eighty bovine incisors were worn to expose an area of dentin, that were acid-etched (37% phosphoric acid) and rinsed. The teeth were divided into 4 groups (n = 20): Group C (Control) - Single Bond; Group CHX - 0.2% CHX for 30s + Single Bond; Group EGCG - active EGCG gel at 10 µM for 30 s + Single Bond; Group GT - aqueous green tea for 30s + Single Bond. Blocks of composite were fabricated and stored for 24 h or 6 months, sectioned into beams and submitted to microtensile tests. Results were analyzed by two-way ANOVA and Tukey’s test (5%). Results: Mean (±SD) values (in MPa) were as follow: CHX (24 h) – 41.76 (±2.62); C (24 h) - 40.81 (±3.35); GT (24 h): 37.38(2.98); CHX (6 months) - 36.04 (±3.52); EGCG (24h) - 35.91 (±4.82); EGCG (6 months) - 35.75 (±4.44); GT (6 months) - 31.95 (±3.40); C (6 months): 30.05 (±1.54). Conclusion: EGCG produced resin-dentin bonds that did not change after 6 months water storage but it decreased the immediate bond strength when compared to control and chlorhexidine groups

Tensile bond strength between auto-polymerized acrylic resin and acrylic denture teeth treated with MF-MA solution

PURPOSE: This study evaluated the effect of chemical surface treatment using methyl formate-methyl acetate (MF-MA) solution on the tensile bond strength between acrylic denture teeth and auto-polymerized acrylic resin. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seventy maxillary central incisor acrylic denture teeth for each of three different brands (Yamahachi New Ace; Major Dent; Cosmo HXL) were embedded with incisal edge downwards in auto-polymerized resin in polyethylene pipes and ground with silicone carbide paper on their ridge lap surfaces. The teeth of each brand were divided into seven groups (n=10): no surface treatment (control group), MF-MA solution at a ratio of 25:75 (v/v) for 15 seconds, 30 seconds, 60 seconds, 120 seconds, 180 seconds, and MMA for 180 seconds. Auto-polymerized acrylic resin (Unifast Trad) was applied to the ground surface and polymerized in a pressure cooker. A tensile strength test was performed with a universal testing machine. Statistical analysis of the results was performed using two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and post-hoc Dunnett T3 test (α=.05). RESULTS: The surface treatment groups had significantly higher mean tensile bond strengths compared with the control group (P.05), except for the Yamahachi New Ace MF-MA 180-second group (P<.05). CONCLUSION: 15-second MF-MA solution can be an alternative chemical surface treatment for repairing a denture base and rebonding acrylic denture teeth with auto-polymerized acrylic resin, for both conventional and cross-linked teeth.

Microtensile bond strength and micromorphologic analysis of surface-treated resin nanoceramics

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of different surface treatment methods on the microtensile bond strength of resin cement to resin nanoceramic (RNC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: RNC onlays (Lava Ultimate) (n=30) were treated using air abrasion with and without a universal adhesive, or HF etching followed by a universal adhesive with and without a silane coupling agent, or tribological silica coating with and without a universal adhesive, and divided into 6 groups. Onlays were luted with resin cement to dentin surfaces. A microtensile bond strength test was performed and evaluated by one-way ANOVA and Tukey HSD test (α=.05). A nanoscratch test, field emission scanning electron microscopy, and energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy were used for micromorphologic analysis (α=.05). The roughness and elemental proportion were evaluated by Kruskal–Wallis test and Mann–Whitney U test. RESULTS: Tribological silica coating showed the highest roughness, followed by air abrasion and HF etching. After HF etching, the RNC surface presented a decrease in oxygen, silicon, and zirconium ratio with increasing carbon ratio. Air abrasion with universal adhesive showed the highest bond strength followed by tribological silica coating with universal adhesive. HF etching with universal adhesive showed the lowest bond strength. CONCLUSION: An improved understanding of the effect of surface treatment of RNC could enhance the durability of resin bonding when used for indirect restorations. When using RNC for restoration, effective and systemic surface roughening methods and an appropriate adhesive are required.

Effect of dentin desensitizers on resin cement bond strengths

Introduction: The crown preparation promotes the exposure of dentin tubules. Thus, to avoid post-operative sensitivity, the first approach involves the use of dentin adhesives, and the second one the use of dentin desensitizers. Objective: This study evaluated the effect of dentin desensitizers on microtensile bond strengths (μTBSs) of a resin cement to dentin. Material and methods: Twenty bovine teeth were prepared until obtaining flat dentin surfaces. A standardized smear layer was created (#600-grit SiC paper). The samples were randomly divided into the following four groups (n = 5): no treatment (Control), treatment with Gluma Desensitizer (Heraeus Kulzer), Super Seal (Phoenix Dental) and Teethmate Desensitizer (Kuraray Noritake Dental). The dentin surfaces were then treated with ED Primer II (Kuraray Noritake Dental). Twenty composite blocks, 4 mm thick (Estenia CeB, Kuraray Noritake Dental) were used. The composite surfaces were abraded with aluminum oxide (50 μm), and then silanized. The composite block was bonded to the dentin surface with a resin cement (Panavia F 2.0, Kuraray Noritake Dental) according to the manufacturer's instructions. After 24-hour storage (37ºC, 100% RH), the bonded samples were cut into beam-shaped microtensile specimens and loaded in tension until failure. Data were analyzed with one-way ANOVA and the Dunnett's test (α = 0.05). An SEM was used to examine the failure modes. Results: The μTBSs (MPa ± SD) were: 24.4 ± 3.2 (Control), 14.0 ± 5.6 (Gluma Desensitizer), 8.6 ± 4.7 (Super Seal), and 34.7 ± 4.6 (Teethmate Desensitizer), in which there were significant differences among the four groups (p < 0.05). The Teethmate Desensitizer group showed the highest μTBS, while the Super Seal group showed the lowest mean of μTBS to dentin. Conclusion: The efficacy of the desensitizers is material-dependent; Gluma Desensitizer and Super Seal decreased the μTBSs, however, Teethmate Desensitizer improved it.

Influence of different surface treatments in bond strength of brackets to porcelain / 吉林大学学报(医学版)

Objective To observe the porcelain treated with Nd∶YAG laser irradiation and hydrofluoric acid (HF), and to explore the influence of integrated treatment of Nd ∶ YAG laser irradiation and HF etching in the bond strength of brackets to porcelain.Methods 48 metal ceramic prostheses were randomly divided into untreated control group,HF group,grooved treatment group,0.75W laser group,1.05W laser group,1.45W laser group. All samples were bonded to the brackets.After temperature cycling test,the shear bond strength (SBS)and tensile bond strength (TBS)were measured.Results There were significant differences in SBS and TBS between various surface treatment groups and untreated control group (P < 0.01).The SBS and TBS of brackets bonded in HF group was significantly higher than those in 1.05W laser and 1.45W laser groups (P <0.05).The SBS and TBS in 1.05W laser and 1.45W laser groups were higher than those in HF group (P <0.05).The SBS and TBS in 1.05W laser group were higher than those in other groups (P < 0.05).SBS showed positive correlation with TBS (r =0.426,P =0.000).Conclusion The use of Nd∶YAG laser irradiation with the energy parameter of 1.05W and HF could increase the bonding with formation of composite resin,and the more SBS,the more TBS.

The effects of thermocycling on the tensile bond strength of silicone denture liner incorporated with silver-nano-particles / 实用口腔医学杂志

16 standered acrylic resin blocks with silicone resilient denture liner(10 mm ×8 mm ×3 mm)incorporated with nano-silver par-ticles at 5% (m/m,by dry wet)in-between were prepared.8 blocks were immersed in distilled water for 24 h at 37 ℃ as the controls (group 1).Another 8 were thermocycled for 4 000 cycles(group 2).16 acrylic resin bars were thermal cycled for 4 000 cycles.Then they were processed exactly as the control group (group 3).Tensile bond strength of the specimens was measured by a universal testing machine. The bond strength values(MPa)of group 1,2 and 3 were 2.683 ±0.435,2.179 ±0.633 and 1.460 ±0.566 respectively(group 1 vs 2,P>0.05;group 3 vs 1 or 2,P<0.05).The failure mode of the blocks in group 1 and 2 was mainly cohesive failure,in group 3 adhesion fail-ure.

Evaluation of tensile bond strength of heat cure and autopolymerizing silicone-based resilient denture liners before and after thermocycling.

Aim: To assess the effect of simulated mouth conditions reproduced with thermocycling on the tensile bond strength of two silicone based resilient denture liners with acrylic resin bases. Materials and Methods: Two silicone-based soft denture liners (Mollosil - Chairside autopolymerization and Molloplast B - Heat polymerization) were tested. For each liner, 30 specimens with a cross-sectional area of 10 Χ 10 mm and thickness 3 mm were processed between two acrylic blocks (Trevalon). Specimens were divided into a control group that was stored for 24 hours in water at 37°C and a test group that was thermocycled (2500 cycles) between baths of 5° and 55°C. Tensile bond strength (kg/cm 2 ) was determined in a universal testing machine using crosshead speed of 5 mm/min. Statistical Analysis Used: The student t-test was used to determine the significance of the difference in bond strength between the two liners. Results: The mean tensile bond strength for control and thermocycled specimens of the two liners were: Mollosil (6.82 kg/cm 2 and 8.41 kg/cm 2 ) and Molloplast-B (16.30 kg/cm 2 and 13.67 kg/cm 2 ), respectively. Comparison of bond strength of control specimens with thermocycled specimens of the liners indicated a significant difference for both Mollosil (P=0.045) and Molloplast-B (P=0.027). Comparison between control specimens of both liners and thermocycled specimens of both liners indicated a highly significant difference (P<0.001). Conclusions: Heat polymerized resilient denture liner Molloplast-B had higher tensile bond strength than autopolymerizing liner Mollosil regardless of thermocycling. The bond strength of Mollosil increased after thermocycling while that of Molloplast-B decreased after thermocycling. Clinical Implications: Although heat-polymerized denture liners require more processing time than autopolymerizing liners, but they display much better adhesion properties to denture base resin and should thus be preferred when soft liner has to be used for a longer duration of time.

Evaluation of changes in adhesive strength and cytotoxicity of a denture adhesive according to time / 대한치과보철학회지

STATEMENTS OF THE PROBLEM: Many denture wearers occasionally use denture adhesives to improve denture retention, stability and chewing efficiency. An ideal denture adhesive is nontoxic, non-irritating, and provides comfort to the oral mucosa. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the cytotoxicity and adhesive properties of a selected denture adhesive. MATERIAL AND METHODS: To test cytotoxicity of the selected denture adhesive, mouse fibroblast cells were used in MTT testing. Cytotoxicity was examined according to the concentration of the denture adhesive and incubated for 1 to 4 days. To examine adhesive property, a denture base was fabricated on an edentulous dentiform. The adhesive was applied to the denture base, then tensile bond strength was measured, to evaluate the change in retention during 3 days. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: 1. 1% and 2% concentration denture adhesive cream had no cytotoxicity. 2. The tensile bond strength of the group with both denture adhesive and artificial saliva was significantly higher than that of the group with only denture adhesive (P < .05). The tensile bond strength of the group with denture adhesive was significantly higher than that of with only artificial saliva (P < .05). 3. The tensile bond strength had no significant change during 1 hour, and then gradually decreased. After 1 day, it decrease to half. Within the limitation of this study, the tested denture adhesive had no cytotoxicilty and was effective in improving denture retention. The adhesive strength began to continuously decrease after 1 hour and it decreased to half at 1 day after application.

Drying time of tray adhesive for adequate tensile bond strength between polyvinylsiloxane impression and tray resin material

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: Use of custom tray and tray adhesive is clinically recommended for elastomeric impression material. However there is not clear mention of drying time of tray adhesive in achieving appropriate bonding strength of tray material and impression material. PURPOSE: This study is to investigate an appropriate drying time of tray adhesives by evaluating tensile bonding strength between two types of polyvinylsiloxane impression materials and resin tray, according to various drying time intervals of tray adhesives, and with different manufacturing company combination of impression material and tray adhesive. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Adhesives used in this study were Silfix (Dentsply Caulk, Milford, Del, USA) and VPS Tray Adhesive (3M ESPE, Seefeld, Germany) and impression materials were Aquasil Ultra (monophase regular set, Dentsply Caulk, Milford, Del, USA) and Imprint II Garant (regular body, 3M ESPE, Seefeld, Germany). They were used combinations from the same manufacture and exchanged combinations of the two. The drying time was designed to air dry, 5 minutes, 10 minutes, 15 minutes, 20 minutes, and 25 minutes. Total 240 of test specimens were prepared by auto-polymerizing tray material (Instant Tray Mix, Lang, Wheeling, Il, USA) with 10 specimens in each group. The specimens were placed in the Universal Testing machine (Instron, model 3366, Instron Corp, University avenue, Nowood, MA, USA) to perform the tensile test (cross head speed 5 mm/min). The statistically efficient drying time was evaluated through ANOVA and Scheffe test. All the tests were performed at 95% confidence level. RESULTS: The results revealed that at least 10 minutes is needed for Silfix-Aquasil, and 15 minutes for VPS Tray Adhesive-Imprint II, to attain an appropriate tensile bonding strength. VPS Tray Adhesive-Imprint II had a superior tensile bonding strength when compared to Silfix-Aquasil over 15 minutes. Silfix-Aquasil had a superior bonding strength to VPS Tray Adhesive-Aquasil, and VPS Tray Adhesive-Imprint II had a superior tensile bonding strength to Silfix-Imprint II at all drying periods. CONCLUSION: Significant increase in tensile bonding strength with Silfix-Aquasil and VPS Tray adhesive-Imprint II combination until 10 and 15 minutes respectively. Tray adhesive-impression material combination from the same company presented higher tensile bonding strength at all drying time intervals than when using tray adhesive-impression material of different manufactures.

Effect of dentin surface wetness on tensile bond strength of self adhesive resin cements / 대한치과보존학회지

The purpose of this study was to compare the tensile bond strength of several self-adhesive resin cements bonded to dentin surfaces with different wet conditions. Three self-adhesive resin cements; Rely-X Unicem (3M ESPE, St. Paul, MN, USA), Embrace Wetbond (Pulpdent, Oakland, MA, USA), Maxcem (Kerr, Orange, CA, USA) were used. Extracted sixty human molars were used. Each self-adhesive resin cement was adhered to the dentin specimens (two rectangular sticks from each molar) in different wet conditions. Tensile bond strength were measured using universal testing machine (EZ Test, Shimadzu corporation, Kyoto, Japan) at a crosshead speed of 1.0mm/min. After the testing, bonding failures of specimens were observed by Operative microscope (OPMI pro, Carl Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany). T-test was used to evaluate the effect of dentin surface wetness. One-way ANOVA test was used to evaluate the tensile bond strength of self-adhesive resin cements in the same condition. Scheffe's test was used for statistical analyzing at the 95% level of confidence. The result showed that wetness of dentin surface didn't affect tensile bond strength of self-adhesive resin cements and Maxcem showed the lowest tensile bond strength.

Efeito de material cimentante e do tempo na resistência adesiva de pinos de fibra de vidro / Effect of cementing material and time on tensile bond strength of fiber glass posts

O objetivo desse estudo foi avaliar in vitro a resistência à tração de pinos de fibra de vidro cimentados em raízes de dentes bovinos com quatro agentes cimentantes em dois períodos de tempo de armazenamento em saliva artificial: com 48 horas e após 240 dias. Para tal, foram utilizadas 80 raízes de dentes bovinos que, após tratamento endodôntico, foram divididas em 8 grupos com 10 raízes para cada grupo. Para a fixação dos pinos foram utilizados 4 diferentes agentes cimentantes sendo que, os quatro primeiros grupos foram armazenados em saliva artificial por 48 horas antes do teste de tração; a saber: Grupo I – cimento resinoso dual (Rely X e Adper Single Bond-3M/ESPE), Grupo II – cimento de ionômero de vidro (Bioglass “C”- BIODINÂMICA), Grupo III – cimento de fosfato de zinco (SS WHITE), Grupo IV – cimento resinoso quimicamente ativado (CB Cement e One-Step/ BISCO). Os outros 4 Grupos (V, VI, VII e VIII) receberam os mesmos agentes cimentantes citados acima e na mesma seqüência porém, armazenados em saliva artificial por 240 dias antes da realização do teste de resistência à tração em uma Máquina de Ensaio Universal (VERSAT 500) à velocidade de deslocamento de 1,0 mm/min. Os dados foram catalogados e submetidos à análise estatística mediante os testes Análise de Variância, Tukey e t-student. Os resultados mostraram após 48 horas de armazenamento, o comportamento dos Grupos em estudo e podem assim ser representados: G IV > G III > G I > G II, no entanto, após 240 dias: G VIII = G VII  G VI  G V; concluindo que: a resistência à tração de pinos de fibra de vidro; cimentada em raízes bovina, foi influenciada com o tempo, pois, quanto maior o tempo de envelhecimento, menor é o valor da resistência, com exceção do cimento de ionômero de vidro.

The purpose of the present investigation was to assess the in vitro tensile bond strength resistence of fiberglass posts retained with different cementing agents in bovine teeth at different time points, upon incubation with artificial saliva. To that end, eighty roots harvested from bovine teeth received endodontic treatment and were split into 8 groups (10 roots per group). The fiberglass posts were retained with four different cementing agents, and the first groups were incubated with artificial saliva 48 hours before the tensile test. The groups were distributed as follows: Group I – dual resin cement (Rely X e Adper Single Bond-3M/ESPE), Group II – glass ionomer cement (Bioglass “C”- BIODINÂMICA), Group III – zinc phosphate cement (SS WHITE) and Group IV – chemically activated resin cement (C&B Cement e One -Step/BISCO). The remaining four groups (V, VI, VII and VIII) were accordingly treated with the same cementing agents and conditions, except for the fact that they were incubated with artificial saliva for 240 days before being subjected to the tensile test using a Universal Testing Machine (VERSAT 500) at 1.0 mm/min. The data generated were collected and subjected to statistical analysis through ANOVA, Tukey post-hoc and Student-t tests. After 48 hours of incubation in artificial saliva, the outcome can be presented as follows regarding the traction test: G IV > G III > G I > G II. On the other hand, after 240 days of incubation the outcome was G VIII = G VII  G VI  G V. The findings allow us to state that the tensile bond strength of fiberglass posts cemented in bovine teeth roots was affected by the variable time because the longer the aging the lower is the resistance, except the glass ionomer cement.

Effect of air abrasion on tensile bond strength of a single-bottle adhesive/indirect composite system to enamel

This study evaluated the efficiency of air abrasion alone and associated with phosphoric acid etching on tensile bond strength of a single-bottle adhesive/indirect composite restorative system (Bond 1/Alert) to human enamel. Forty enamel surfaces from extracted human third molars were assigned to 4 groups (n= 10). Mach 4.1 (Kreativ Inc.) air abrasion equipment was used for 20 s. A special system of rod pairs aligned in a specific apparatus was used for tensile strength tests, according to ISO/TR 11405 standard (1994) with some modifications. Bond strength means were: G1 (air abrasion + rinsing + condensable composite resin Alert) = 3.46 ± 0.83 MPa; G2 (air abrasion + rinsing + Bond 1 adhesive system + Alert) = 4.00 ± 1.60 MPa; G3 (air abrasion + rinsing + 37 percent phosphoric acid + rinsing + Bond 1 + Alert) = 20.80 ± 3.95 MPa; and G4 (37 percent phosphoric acid + rinsing + Bond 1 + Alert) = 17.00 ± 2.74 MPa. The statistical analysis by Kruskal-Wallis test revealed that G1 and G2 presented statistically significant difference (p< 0.05) from G3 and G4 (p<0.01) and G1 and G3 did not differ significantly (p> 0.05) from G2 and G4, respectively.

O objetivo deste estudo foi avaliar a eficiência da abrasão a ar associada ou não ao condicionamento com ácido fosfórico na resistência à tração de um sistema restaurador composto por adesivo frasco único/resina composta indireta (Bond 1/Alert) ao esmalte humano. Quarenta superfícies de esmalte de terceiros molares humanos extraídos foram alocadas em 4 grupos (n=10). Foi utilizado o sistema de ar abrasivo Mach 4.1 (Kreativ Inc.) durante 20 s. Um sistema especial de pares de hastes alinhadas em um equipamento específico foi usado para realização dos testes de tração, de acordo com a Norma ISO/TR 11405 (1994) com algumas modificações. Os valores médios obtidos foram: G1 (ar abrasivo + lavagem + resina condensável Alert) = 3,46 ± 0,83 MPa; G2 (ar abrasivo + lavagem + adesivo Bond 1 + Alert) = 4,00 ± 1,60 MPa; G3 (ar abrasivo + lavagem + ácido fosfórico 37 por cento + lavagem + Bond 1 + Alert) = 20,80 ± 3,95 MPa; e G4 (ácido fosfórico 37 por cento + lavagem + Bond 1 + Alert) = 17,00 ± 2,74 MPa. Pela análise estatística (teste Kruskal Wallis), G1 e G2 apresentaram diferença estatisticamente significante em relação a G3 e G4 (p<0,01) e G1 e G3 não diferiram dos grupos G2 e G4, respectivamente (p>0,05).

Tensile bond strength between elastomeric impression materials and tray resins depending on the thickness of the tray adhesive / 대한치과보철학회지

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: Elastomeric impression materials have been widely used to obtain an accurate impression. However there have not been enough studies on the influence of the thickness of the tray adhesives on the bonding strength between the trays and the elastomeric impression materials. PURPOSE: In order to understand the relationship between the thickness of the tray adhesive and the tensile bond strength and to suggest the thickness at which the bonding strength is strongest, tensile bond strength related to the thickness of adhesives of 3 different elastomeric impression materials were tested. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 3 impression materials, Permlastic(R) Regular Set(Kerr Corp., Romulus, Michigan, U.S.A.), Impregum(TM) Penta(TM)(3M ESPE, Seefeld, Germany), and Aquasil Ultra Monophase Regular Set Smart Wetting(R) (Dentsply Caulk, Milford, Delaware, U.S.A.), were used in this study, and tray adhesives from the same manufacturers of the impression materials were used, which were Rubber Base Adhesive, Polyether Adhesive, and Silfix, respectively. The tray specimens were prepared by autopolymerizing the tray material(Instant Tray Mix, Lang, Wheeling, Illinois, U.S.A.), and a PVC pipe was used to house the impression material. In group A, tray adhesives were applied in multiple thin layers of 1 to 5 and in group B, adhesives were applied only once, in the thickness equivalent to several applications. Lightness(L*) of the adhesion surface was measured with a spectrophotometer (CM-3500d, Konica Minolta, Sakai, Osaka, Japan). The tensile bond strength of the elastomeric impression material and the tray resin was measured with universal materials testing machines(Instron, Model 3366, Instron Corp, Nowood, Massachusetts, U.S.A.). A formula between the number of adhesive application layers and the lightness of the adhesion surface was deduced in group A, and the number of adhesive layers in group B was estimated by applying the lightness(L*) to the deduced formula. RESULTS: 1. In group A, a statistically significant increase in tensile bond strength appeared when the number of application layers increased from 1 to 2 and from 4 to 5, and no significant difference was present between 2, 3, and 4 layers in Permlastic. In Impregum, the tensile bond strength was significantly increased when the number of adhesive layers increased from 1 to 3, but no significant difference after 3 layers. In Aquasil, the tensile bond strength significantly increased as the number of application layers increased up to 4 but showed no significant difference between 4 and 5. 2. In group B, the tensile bond strength was decreased when the thickness of the adhesive increased in Permlastic. Impregum showed an increased tensile bond strength when the thickness of the adhesive was increased. In Aquasil, the tensile bond strength increased as the number of adhesive application layers increased up to approximately 2.5 layers but it sharply decreased after approximately 4.5. CONCLUSION: From the study, the common idea that it is better to apply a thin and single coat of tray adhesive needs correction in more detailed ways, and instructions on some of the tray adhesives should be reconsidered since there were several cases in which the tensile bond strength increased according to the increase in the thickness of the adhesives.